Must we believe Idiocies to appear educated?
Jul 22, 2023 11:16:38 GMT -5
Post by Radrook Admin on Jul 22, 2023 11:16:38 GMT -5
Must we believe Idiocies to appear educated?
Seems like a rather weird question, doesn't it? After all, what person in his right mind would demand belief in an idiocy in order to look smart? Well, the straight up answer that comes to mind is an idiot. Right? Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be so. You see, the ones who are glibly proposing idiocies as a standard for qualifying people as smart or dumb go by the titles of scientists, such as biologists and astrophysicists. Hard to believe? Well, let me explain and you judge for yourself whether the accusation of idiocies is justifiable or not.
Two Idiocies
The universe came from nothing
Now, naturally, a normal person's reaction to such a claim is one of utter disbelief. Why? Simple, because human experience tells us that this is simply an impossibility. In short, we need for things to exist in order to in order to produce other things is a given, and irrefutable fact. For example, we need fuel to create a fire. Stars need certain elements, such as hydrogen ad helium in there cores in order to create nuclear fusion, in ort, things simply do not pop into existence without their components have to be somewhere else had have been preceded by something else ad infinitum. etc.
Yet these scientists glibly telling us tongue in cheek, that everything we see everywhere in the universe arose from nothing? Now, if they are pressed for an explanation, guess what? They have absolutely none. In fact, the only way that they can get around that idiotic statement is to say that they don't really mean what they are saying. That to them, nothing really doesn't mean nothing. That to them it means something because nature hates a vacuum.
Now, the scientist who made that statement drew laughter from the audience. He was baffled and asked why the audience found the statement funny. The minister whom he was debating told him that it seemed silly for him to be struggling with the concept of nothingness in that way. Which is true. Why propose nothingness when you actually mean something? Yet, if anyone contradicts this crazy idea, then of course they cannot be considered educated.
Now, do the so-called virtual particles idea prove them right? No it doesn't. You see, as it turns out, the term virtual particle is a deceptive misnomer, since virtual particles are not particles at all, but are merely the fluctuating interaction between differences in the Electromagnetic fields that have been given that name.
Deception of Virtual Particles
Now, do the so-called virtual particles idea prove them right? No it doesn't. You see, as it turns out, the term virtual particle is a deceptive misnomer, since virtual particles are not particles at all, but are merely the fluctuating interaction between differences in the Electromagnetic fields that have been given that name.
Virtual' Particles Are Just 'Wiggles' in the Electromagnetic Field
www.livescience.com/55833-what-are-virtual-particles.html
www.livescience.com/55833-what-are-virtual-particles.html
Abiogenesis
Then we have the idea of abiogenesis. Scientists glibly assume that abiogenesis, the sudden appearance of life due to chemical reactions in liquids, especially water, must be occurring repeatedly somewhere all over the universe.
But this concept is seriously flawed and has absolutely nothing to do with the scientific method.
But this concept is seriously flawed and has absolutely nothing to do with the scientific method.
Scientific Method
noun
: principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientific%20method
noun
: principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientific%20method
Lack of observational evidence In Nature
Now, the one reason why this is an illogical, non-scientific conclusion is a very simple one. It lacks observational support. You see, with all the abundance of water that we have on Earth. no one has ever witnessed abiogenesis occurring.
Lack of Experimental observation in a lab
Even equally significant is that it cannot be forced to happen even under strictly controlled conditions in a laboratory. Because of this, claiming that it must have happened on Earth is a baseless claim similar to blind faith. But it gets even sillier. You see, despite not having even a shred of evidence that it has happened here on Earth, they boldly proclaim that it MUST be happening repeatedly all over the universe under the right conditions. Just a little bit of water. of course, and Pop goes the weasel! This goes hand in hand with the other reason why it is an idiocy as described below.1. Ignoring evidence of a Creative mind
The second reason why this is an idiotic statement is because it blatantly ignores the overwhelmingly compelling evidence of an organizing reasoning mind at work in nature.
You see, biologically, everywhere in nature on microscopic level, molecular machines specifically designed and meticulously programmed to carry out some pre-assigned specific tasks such as DNA coding, DNA Repair reading and translation of coded DNA information are observed. So the conclusion of a mind at work is essential in order to remain cogent in reasoning.
Yet, they stubbornly refuse to reach the obvious and required conclusion, and choose to propose that all this happened by itself instead. Now, that is far worse than claiming that a car, which is infinitely more simple, created its own parts the parts and then assembled them into a functioning machine all by its mindless self.
Psalm 14:1 ►
....The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” ....
Romans 1:20 ►
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
Romans 1:20 ►
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.