New Estimate for the Age of the Universe
Jul 18, 2023 20:58:28 GMT -5
Post by Radrook Admin on Jul 18, 2023 20:58:28 GMT -5
New Estimate for the Age of the Universe
Well, it's happened again, just as it happened in reference to other human ideas that had to be discarded and replaced, such as the geocentric, or Earth centered model of our solar system that had to be replaced by the sun-centric, or heliocentric one. But this the it involves the entire universe itself.
You see, the universe that was estimated to be only 13 billion years, old is now being estimated to be 27 billion years old. that's a little more than twice its currently estimated age.
Why? Simple. Because the James Web Telescope, which is the most powerful one invented, and focuses on the infra red, has discovered certain things about our universe that are totally incompatible with the current model, such as the detection of fully-developed galaxies at distances where galaxies were expected to be in their embryonic stages of development. The excerpt below explains it:
Of course, this revelation makes all the assumptions that were based on the concept of the much younger universe totally invalid. Which means that they will now need to adopt a new model that explains what we are detecting in the observable cosmos.
Below is a video concerning this new estimate for the age of the universe. that demonstrates why it is very important not to accept any current scientific theories as expressing absolute truth, but to view them as merely ideas based on human interpretation of available evidence.
You see, the universe that was estimated to be only 13 billion years, old is now being estimated to be 27 billion years old. that's a little more than twice its currently estimated age.
Age of the universe estimated at 26.7 billion years
According to the study’s author, Rajendra Gupta, a physics professor at the University of Ottawa, their newly-devised model indicates that the universe is 26.7 billion years old, significantly older than the previous estimate of 13.7 billion years.
www.openaccessgovernment.org/age-of-universe-research-james-webb/163845/
According to the study’s author, Rajendra Gupta, a physics professor at the University of Ottawa, their newly-devised model indicates that the universe is 26.7 billion years old, significantly older than the previous estimate of 13.7 billion years.
www.openaccessgovernment.org/age-of-universe-research-james-webb/163845/
Why? Simple. Because the James Web Telescope, which is the most powerful one invented, and focuses on the infra red, has discovered certain things about our universe that are totally incompatible with the current model, such as the detection of fully-developed galaxies at distances where galaxies were expected to be in their embryonic stages of development. The excerpt below explains it:
It isn’t easy to build a galaxy. The universe is a good 13.8 billion years old and the earliest galaxies ever detected—spotted by the James Webb Space telescope last November—did not form until 350 million years after the Big Bang.
Not only did that infant universe take its time bringing forth its first galactic masses, it also didn’t build very big ones once it got around to it. The first galaxies were often dwarf galaxies—containing perhaps 100 million stars—compared to the size of modern galaxies like our Milky Way, which is believed to contain a minimum of 100 billion stars. Early galaxies, so the rule goes, were pipsqueaks.
Or at least that’s what the rule used to be. According to a new paper published today in Nature, objects that are thought to be at least six galaxies dating back as far as 500 million years after the Big Bang have been discovered with populations of tens or even hundreds of billions of stars. The largest of the six is thought to have a collective mass one trillion times greater than our sun—or 10 times the size of the Milky Way.
time.com/6257544/webb-telescope-galaxies/
Not only did that infant universe take its time bringing forth its first galactic masses, it also didn’t build very big ones once it got around to it. The first galaxies were often dwarf galaxies—containing perhaps 100 million stars—compared to the size of modern galaxies like our Milky Way, which is believed to contain a minimum of 100 billion stars. Early galaxies, so the rule goes, were pipsqueaks.
Or at least that’s what the rule used to be. According to a new paper published today in Nature, objects that are thought to be at least six galaxies dating back as far as 500 million years after the Big Bang have been discovered with populations of tens or even hundreds of billions of stars. The largest of the six is thought to have a collective mass one trillion times greater than our sun—or 10 times the size of the Milky Way.
time.com/6257544/webb-telescope-galaxies/
Below is a video concerning this new estimate for the age of the universe. that demonstrates why it is very important not to accept any current scientific theories as expressing absolute truth, but to view them as merely ideas based on human interpretation of available evidence.