Post by Radrook Admin on Feb 18, 2021 12:37:21 GMT -5
Example of Assuming Abiogenesis Without Evidence
As stated in another thread, there is absolutely no evidence that life arises from water via a process called abiogenesis, or life arising from non-life. Neither can this imagined process be reproduced in a laboratory. In short, the belief has absolutely no basis in observed reality either in nature or in a lab.
It merely constitutes the strong wishful thinking of scientists who suffer from theophobia, fear of gods and religion, and who suspend their reasoning abilities in order and implant their unsubstantiated atheistic concepts in others by presenting them as if they were irrefutable fact.
Ironically, ones doing this tag themselves proudly as scientists. But their modus operandi is definitely not scientific In fact, it is the antithesis of science, and fits the description of quackery instead. You see, science demands the acceptance of facts objectively regardless of personal feelings. Rejection of facts or evidence that strongly indicates a certain conclusion due to personal preferences or a strong aversion, is mere quackery. The vast majority of these so-called scientists say that they never present abiogenesis as anything other than a hypothesis. Oh really? Is that why it is understood as fact and taught in universities as having taken place prior to evolution? Is that why professors who choose to teach creation instead are persecuted and hounded in the halls of academe? Is that why children walk away from the educational systems assuming it to be fact?
The video below demonstrates that their claim that they are not presenting Abiogenesis as irrefutable fat is a blatant lie. It shows just how far they are willing to ignore the astronomical complexities that such assumptions require. The forethought and planning that such complex systems indicate took place. The forethought necessary to encode a DNA and to make molecular machines for its repair when necessary.
It harkens back to the time when protoplasm was viewed just as a simple blob and nothing more and during which time this idea took hold. It is an idea dependent millions of HAPPY Accidents all astronomically highly improbable and coordinating with the one another as if guided by a planning conscious mind. They know this, but their aversion to religion, and towards the concept of a creator, cripples their responsibility and willingness to be honest.
It merely constitutes the strong wishful thinking of scientists who suffer from theophobia, fear of gods and religion, and who suspend their reasoning abilities in order and implant their unsubstantiated atheistic concepts in others by presenting them as if they were irrefutable fact.
Ironically, ones doing this tag themselves proudly as scientists. But their modus operandi is definitely not scientific In fact, it is the antithesis of science, and fits the description of quackery instead. You see, science demands the acceptance of facts objectively regardless of personal feelings. Rejection of facts or evidence that strongly indicates a certain conclusion due to personal preferences or a strong aversion, is mere quackery. The vast majority of these so-called scientists say that they never present abiogenesis as anything other than a hypothesis. Oh really? Is that why it is understood as fact and taught in universities as having taken place prior to evolution? Is that why professors who choose to teach creation instead are persecuted and hounded in the halls of academe? Is that why children walk away from the educational systems assuming it to be fact?
The video below demonstrates that their claim that they are not presenting Abiogenesis as irrefutable fat is a blatant lie. It shows just how far they are willing to ignore the astronomical complexities that such assumptions require. The forethought and planning that such complex systems indicate took place. The forethought necessary to encode a DNA and to make molecular machines for its repair when necessary.
It harkens back to the time when protoplasm was viewed just as a simple blob and nothing more and during which time this idea took hold. It is an idea dependent millions of HAPPY Accidents all astronomically highly improbable and coordinating with the one another as if guided by a planning conscious mind. They know this, but their aversion to religion, and towards the concept of a creator, cripples their responsibility and willingness to be honest.