Post by Radrook Admin on Feb 1, 2021 23:17:11 GMT -5
A Code that Coded Itself?
Now, at first glance, that statement might appear to be something that no person in his right mind would claim-right? After all, it is obvious that all codes are the result of an effort to communicate via symbols and that communication has a target and that the target is expected to be able to understand the code that the coder is using. For example, the Japanese and German codes during the ware were written specifically for those who knew how to read the symbols being used. Otherwise the symbols would have been useless and writing them would have made no sense. So whenever someone encounters a code, it is only normal and natural to assume the following:
1. An author capable of inventing the code so that it carries meaning
2. An intended audience who will understand the code's meaning
3. A specific message in that code.
All this is common knowledge, and s automatically assumed to be true whenever any code is encountered. Otherwise the profession of decoder would be considered a total waste f time. However, this is not assumed in respect to the DNA code, In this particular case all these assumptions are either ignored or denied. In short, they want us to believe that the DNA code
1. Did not have an author to organized an intended meaning
2. Did not have an intended interpreter as a target.
In short, that via purely blind chance, depending on millions of happy improbable accidents, this DNA code, which is responsible for the existence of the human brain which is the most complex computer in the universe, went about assembling itself without any mind to guide it.
Now, as I said from the start, no one in his or her right mind would consider a code capable of writing itself. So the question naturally arises, are these who make that claim about the DNA code in their right minds? Well, actually no. You see, they are driven by an irrational fear called theophobia , fear of the existence of God, which compels them to behave in that totally insane manner and propose a totally insane thing.
The sad part about it is that they have convinced others that they are sane and that they are practicing science when all they are doing is practicing and disseminating quackery and knowingly fooling those who trust them into reaching that same insane conclusion based on trust in their formal education which they themselves have placed on hold.
1. An author capable of inventing the code so that it carries meaning
2. An intended audience who will understand the code's meaning
3. A specific message in that code.
All this is common knowledge, and s automatically assumed to be true whenever any code is encountered. Otherwise the profession of decoder would be considered a total waste f time. However, this is not assumed in respect to the DNA code, In this particular case all these assumptions are either ignored or denied. In short, they want us to believe that the DNA code
1. Did not have an author to organized an intended meaning
2. Did not have an intended interpreter as a target.
In short, that via purely blind chance, depending on millions of happy improbable accidents, this DNA code, which is responsible for the existence of the human brain which is the most complex computer in the universe, went about assembling itself without any mind to guide it.
Now, as I said from the start, no one in his or her right mind would consider a code capable of writing itself. So the question naturally arises, are these who make that claim about the DNA code in their right minds? Well, actually no. You see, they are driven by an irrational fear called theophobia , fear of the existence of God, which compels them to behave in that totally insane manner and propose a totally insane thing.
The sad part about it is that they have convinced others that they are sane and that they are practicing science when all they are doing is practicing and disseminating quackery and knowingly fooling those who trust them into reaching that same insane conclusion based on trust in their formal education which they themselves have placed on hold.