Feigning Mental Idiocy
Aug 11, 2020 19:48:49 GMT -5
Post by Radrook Admin on Aug 11, 2020 19:48:49 GMT -5
Feigning Mental Idiocy
Ever go to a circus and watch a clown making as if he lacked normal intelligence in order to make the audience laugh? He goes about clumsily ignoring the obvious and messes every up. Of course, we laugh because we know it's all in fun and nobody is really harmed by it. However, there are those who use that feigning-of-idiocy concept for a far more sinister purpose. These are the atheist scientists who refuse to admit that the DNA code needed a coder. Suddenly and inexplicable, they go into their inability to think routine.
Can People who resort to feigning an inability to think at a basic level and who are willing to mimic the mentally handicapped in order to avoid reaching a conclusion they dislike be trusted? Of course not. Such individuals are not seeking truth-they are seeking confirmation for their ideas and have purposefully sealed their minds against anything else.
Of course one would expect individuals who fancy themselves scientists to avoid this type of chicanery. Unfortunately, they are the most notorious for employing that obvious ploy. For example, they are very well aware that code requires a coder and that the DNA is a very complex code that reflects the mind of a very sophisticated coder.
Yet, they glibly proclaim that in the instance of the DNA the rule suddenly ceases to exist. No, they do not provide any logical reason why the rule should suddenly cease to exist. Instead, they simply behave as if it doesn't and just proclaim that the DNA managed somehow in some way to code itself so that it contains coded instructions on how to build a human being as well as the design of the nanomachines to build and repair them.
Why would they so confidently propose such an absurdity? Simple. Because normal conclusion that they always reach in reference to all other coded information would require they admit to the existence of a creator and they cannot stomach that conclusion.
So they consider the price of playing the blithering idiot well worth it. That way they can glibly continue to make pompous assertions about impossible statistical events as if they had any real value and avoiding what they consider the obnoxiously unacceptable-the existence of a creator or a God.
So can such individuals be trusted? Now, I woud really need to be truly brain-dead in order to manage that.
Can People who resort to feigning an inability to think at a basic level and who are willing to mimic the mentally handicapped in order to avoid reaching a conclusion they dislike be trusted? Of course not. Such individuals are not seeking truth-they are seeking confirmation for their ideas and have purposefully sealed their minds against anything else.
Of course one would expect individuals who fancy themselves scientists to avoid this type of chicanery. Unfortunately, they are the most notorious for employing that obvious ploy. For example, they are very well aware that code requires a coder and that the DNA is a very complex code that reflects the mind of a very sophisticated coder.
Yet, they glibly proclaim that in the instance of the DNA the rule suddenly ceases to exist. No, they do not provide any logical reason why the rule should suddenly cease to exist. Instead, they simply behave as if it doesn't and just proclaim that the DNA managed somehow in some way to code itself so that it contains coded instructions on how to build a human being as well as the design of the nanomachines to build and repair them.
Why would they so confidently propose such an absurdity? Simple. Because normal conclusion that they always reach in reference to all other coded information would require they admit to the existence of a creator and they cannot stomach that conclusion.
So they consider the price of playing the blithering idiot well worth it. That way they can glibly continue to make pompous assertions about impossible statistical events as if they had any real value and avoiding what they consider the obnoxiously unacceptable-the existence of a creator or a God.
So can such individuals be trusted? Now, I woud really need to be truly brain-dead in order to manage that.