Who Coded the DNA?
Jun 18, 2019 7:52:52 GMT -5
Post by Radrook Admin on Jun 18, 2019 7:52:52 GMT -5
Who Coded the DNA?
First, codes don't code themselves. Codes are always understood to be the product of forethought with a communication purpose as the goal. This is a generally accepted fact until the atheist scientist encounters it in nature. Then he panics and claims that the DNA coded itself.
The monumental problems that such an explanation involves are insurmountable. How does a mindless phenomenon provide strong evidence of being aware of the future needs without being aware of future needs? How is mind displayed without there actually being a mind responsible?
The problem with that self programming explanation is that any definition a code is a set of instructions written in a language that can be understood if deciphered or known beforehand. An example is the HTML code where each HTML symbol has a meaning and the computer knows the meaning and follows that instructions. Of course no one would suggest that the instructions wee mindlessly produced since they show an awareness of
1. Awareness of a purpose or goal.
2. Awareness of the process of writing.
3. Awareness of a need for organization
4. Awareness that someone will be able to READ the code.
html.com
In view of this, would we consider that statement that HTML coded itself a rational one? Would we even be inclined to continue the conversation since the person making that statement must either be joking, or perhaps insane?
Yet we are expected to accept that the DNA code, a code that results in the reproduction of living things just coded itself?
Ironically, such a mentality is quickly discarded whenever any mathematical pattern is detected that indicates a mind.
You know, like a sequence of numbers repeating themselves in a predictable pattern that only a mind could produce in the film Contact. Notice that nobody challenges the conclusion that the message is evidence of mind because if anyone did, that person't education or mental stability would come under serious suspicion.
Yet the much more detailed DNA coded itself and indicates no mind at work?
Excuse me but what we have here are not scientists seeking truth. What we have here are scientists willing to accept the most ridiculous notions as long as those notions serve to deny the obvious evidence of a creative mind.