Abiogenesis Ignores Evidence of Awareness
Jun 16, 2019 21:10:52 GMT -5
Post by Radrook Admin on Jun 16, 2019 21:10:52 GMT -5
Main Objection to Abiogenesis
Besides the fact that abiogenesis has never been observed to happen in nature and cannot be demonstrated as viable in a laboratory, he main problem that creationists have the idea is that it totally ignores the compelling evidence of a planning mind which is evident in nature. Romans 1:20 ►NIV
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse
To make matters worse, those who claim abiogenesis as an indisputable fact, suddenly feign inability to reason cogently, or play dumb. Then when discussing other subjects, they seem to miraculously regain their previous reasoning faculties. In short, they refuse to remain consistent and by doing so provide irrefutable evidence against the feasibility of their own idea. After all, if the idea is logically sound, then those suggesting it would not feel compelled to refuse to think properly, would they? Of course not, When an idea is sound those who propose it welcome the opportunity to prove just how sound it is a and do not need to suddenly feign a mental handicap in order to avoid having to accept a glaring flaw.
What is that glaring flaw that those who propose abiogenesis seek to avoid seriously discussion? It is the flaw of attributing planning and forethought to a totally mindless process while vehemently negating that planning and thought are glaringly involved.
For example, consider the human body, We have the awareness of its future needs enumerated below.
What is that glaring flaw that those who propose abiogenesis seek to avoid seriously discussion? It is the flaw of attributing planning and forethought to a totally mindless process while vehemently negating that planning and thought are glaringly involved.
For example, consider the human body, We have the awareness of its future needs enumerated below.
1. A skeletal system = Awareness of a need for a frame
2. Muscles attached to it by tendons = Awareness of the need to move that frame
3. Bones attached to bones by ligaments = Awareness of importance that that the frame not to fall apart
4. A circulatory system powered by a pump. = Need for transporting oxygen, nourishment
5. Blood vessels that transport the liquid called blood to all cells. =Awareness of a need for a transportation
system.
6. Two organs called lungs to oxygenate that blood to keep the cells alive. = Awareness of oxygenation need.
7. Red blood cells to receive that oxygen. = Awareness that living things need oxygen.
8. White blood cells in that blood to protect the organism from infections = Awareness of future a danger.
9. An immune system that memorizes pathogens s it can react faster to the pathogen reappears. = Planning ahead for future infections.
10. Spinal chord = Awareness of the need for an avenue over which nerve impulses would be carried.
11. Motor Neurons = Awareness of the need for something to make muscles move.
12. Sense Neurons = Awareness of the need for sensations, such as pain, pleasure,
heat, cold, roughness, sweetness, bitterness, sourness vision, roughness, smoothness,
loudness, different colors and odors different smells.
13. The brain = Awareness of the need for an organ which would orchestrate all the other activities of an organism..
14. Optic Nerve= Awareness of the need to carry nerve impulses to the brain's occipital lobe to make sight possible.
25. The eye = Awareness of the need for the eye to focus light on a retina connected to an optic nerve. Of the need of an occipital cerebral lobe to interpret the neurotransmitter signals from the optic nerve into perceived images.
26. Cell nucleus : Awareness that each cell needed a central command center which would orchestrate intra-cellular activity to keep the organism alive.
No, it is not the complexity that we are pointing out. It is the evidence of design towards a purpose or a future use of such organs in a coordinated way that indicates a mind that we are drawing attention to. How does a DNA strand know that it needs self repair? How and when did it embark on setting up a system of self- repair. Who or what taught it what it had to do or which sections needed constant repair and how to go about repairing it.
Please remember, according to the proponents of abiogenesis, all these things are happening in total darkness of the cells and without the ability of thought.
Yet, we have forethought screaming at us and telling us that there was indeed a mind involved ad that s where the abiogenesis idea utterly fails. By ignoring the obvious we are appealing to irrationality and by appealing to irrationality they are discarding the scientific method which must remain rational regardless of how bitter the things that are discovered to be true might be.
Please remember, according to the proponents of abiogenesis, all these things are happening in total darkness of the cells and without the ability of thought.
Yet, we have forethought screaming at us and telling us that there was indeed a mind involved ad that s where the abiogenesis idea utterly fails. By ignoring the obvious we are appealing to irrationality and by appealing to irrationality they are discarding the scientific method which must remain rational regardless of how bitter the things that are discovered to be true might be.