Post by Radrook Admin on Aug 16, 2022 21:14:24 GMT -5
Since that really don't have a logical nor scientific leg to stand on, the atheists are forced to resort to ad hominen, or attack the man.
1. One of their favorites is that non atheists don't understand the scientific method.
2. Another is that Non atheists don't understand evolution.
3. And the last but not least and one of their favorites is that we don't understand what the process of abiogenesis involves.
Let's take ignorance of the scientific method which presuppose that everyone who finds serious flaw with their arguments are undereducated ignoramuses. First, please not that what is being criticized is NOT the scientific method. What is being criticized is the non application of the scientific method and the proposing of ideas that have no scientific method justify the certainty with which they are believed and are taught as fact. So its being taught as fact is criticized for lack of scientific method support.
One is the ignoring of clear evidence of a mind at work as conveyed by DNA having RNA readers and molecular machines to carry out the instructions of the DNA and repair errors in the DNA. .
Of course then they deploy ad populum or numerical preponderance instead of addressing the issues. Which does nothing but make them look even more ridiculous. Especially when they claim to know what how exactly all these molecular machines arose in order to carry out DNA instruction and to eve go about repairing mistakes n the DNMA strand on a regular basis.
Or else they deeply the no True Scotsman fallacy, If a person doesn't accept the fantastic claims they make, then one can never really be a true scientist since no true scientist would ever reject their fantastic claims.
Pease note that at no moment during the debate do they explain exactly how these molecular machines designed to carry out DNA instruction and repair the DNA arose and how a mindless process KNEW that they would be necessary for the proper function of the DNA. After all, when a repairing mechanism, is in place, it's because a NEED to repair has been detected by a mind and the mind has taken protective measures in order to insure proper function.
So when they evade these issues, what they are doing is asking us to adopt the same mindless acceptance of an unproven unobserved idea simply because it is the current fad among most scientists and not because it has an y observational or experimental support to back it up. In essence, they are demanding that we become as irrational as they are in their desperate fanatical effort to avoid the obvious.