|
Post by Radrook Admin on Apr 11, 2020 12:01:41 GMT -5
Parents Must be Committed to their kids: by Evevadandylion
If one does not preconsider the consequences of reckless/neglectful parenting as being a LIFETIME INVESTMENT, that person is too immature to be having sex.
Those who choose to put themselves in position as solely responsible for the teaching of a helpless naive child -- and take it lightly -- are a Cancer spot on society that engender festering feelings of inadequacy and confusion, and play the ultimate role in the downfall of Nations.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on Apr 26, 2020 18:04:06 GMT -5
That's why I believe that a license should be required in order to be allowed to be a parent. Had a license been required, many of the children that have been psychologically mangled by unqualified parents would have been spared the agony.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on Apr 27, 2020 20:50:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 3, 2020 9:05:38 GMT -5
Yes when dealing with psychos that might charismatically trick the test where can a child go to and report? The administrators of test MUST inform every child WHAT AND WHO to find and tell if they feel threatened. No system would be perfect. True, passing a knowledge test doesn't prove a person trustworthy to raise a child. It just means that the person knows what is right and what is wrong in child rearing. In short, if indeed mistakes are made-then ignorance can be ruled out. Same with driving a car, if the person knows the rules, then a traffic violation is not due to ignorance. The point is that since a great percentage of child abuse is generated by parental ignorance, providing such knowledge can be expected to reduce child abuse which stems from it. Another stipulation for the license is a thorough background check which would tend to rule out psychological or emotional instability. Also to assure that the parents are financially able to raise a child in a healthful environment and not in a ghetto. These two together as prerequisites for a parenting license can be expected to have a positive effect.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 3, 2020 18:18:58 GMT -5
It would also tend to infringe on the USA Constitution by interfering with the Bil of Rights.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 4, 2020 10:57:25 GMT -5
Because it invades privacy? Or more? The right to procreate is a right which most governments concede unless there is mental retardation or some other genetic reason to prohibit a couple from it.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 4, 2020 11:07:29 GMT -5
I have come to believe that God makes ways to escape the clutch of sick parents. Just as he does any troubled situation Statistical studies indicate that a significant number of abused children do not escape serious psychological damage.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 6, 2020 3:42:24 GMT -5
Of course. Psychological affects can linger for long periods. But God creates ways to distance self from such atrocities repeating so that recovery can begin I totally agree. With God all things are possible and a Christian derives strength to accomplish such things via the power of holy spirit.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 6, 2020 3:50:08 GMT -5
In the case of procreation rights... The WHO is a bogus cover for governmental entity. Its FAR Too large and impersonal because it is global. Even a national institution alone can be too strong. It ought to be based on regional demographic concerns or at least run unfunded by politician hands Every region experiencing similar pars and status quo should have a voted for and appointed headship organization exclusively for supervision of decent parenting standards and criteria unique to that region. And if a family moves they will register and be held accountable to the new standards or else be sanctioned for not notifying the Board
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 9, 2020 8:42:50 GMT -5
The tyranny of one person is sometimes the benevolence of another. Hitler was considered both tyrant and Saviour during his day. It all depended on who was asked.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 21, 2020 7:37:39 GMT -5
Well truly it wasn't fair for the world to impose such sanctions on the country and blame them for the whole of the first world war. That is in part what feuled sentiment for Hitler's civilians. However those who followed him were ignoring the blatant fact of massacre on every side of the judgmental sphere. Where their conscience was at is really hard to say True, the severe sanctions placed on Germany after WWI laid the foundation which created the profound social discontent leading to WWII. But the question is whether war was the only solution to the problems that the nation faced. The USA faced very similar problems of unemployment during the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. Yet President Roosevelt chose to solve those problems via peaceful means. In stark contrast, Hitler chose militarization and a systematic persecution of a very important segment of its population. But the price that the nation paid for that temporary respite from underemployment was not worth it. BTW That whole scenario constituted nationally-approved bad parenting. Fascist German parents were teaching prejudice and cruelty and disregard for human life. But as the Bible tells us, whatever we sow we reap.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 22, 2020 16:28:33 GMT -5
I agree totally. The USA and Germany were not in the same psychological situation of being scapegoats or saddled with the same national financial burden of having to pay for war damages considered unfairly severe. However, had Hitler not arisen at that psychologically vulnerable time, the nation would have found a better way to deal with the problems. So in my opinion, it wasn't primarily the deep resentment that led to the violent demonic solutions but the man and his fanatical ideology which fanned the flames of human irrationality for his own ambitious purpose. Please note that the Allies bent over backward to avoid another World War by allowing Hitler to stop payments, to re-militarize the nation, and to steamroll through several countries in order to pacify him. Yet Hitler interpreted it as a weakness. Hitler appeased at Munich www.history.com/this-day-in-history/hitler-appeased-at-munich
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 22, 2020 16:38:38 GMT -5
Honestly why the Russians or British weren't sanctioned after the war for their heinous acts all thru the 19th century which led to the ugliness in the start of the 20th century, is truly beyond me. Their leaders have war mongered and pillaged as much as anyone in recent memory. The reason wars happen is bc leaders want to annex land and slave power. I wonder why God does not call people to stop those leaders individually. The reasons for his waiting and citizens suffering harshly is truly beyond me. I guess because life in flesh does not matter at all in the long run for anyone, but only acknowledging Gods supreme law as Good! Because one of the universal sovereignty issues still needs to be settled. The Issue was raised by Satan's accusation that God was selfishly withholding something good from his creatures because he feared that they would succeed without him. Gen 3: 5 “Is it really so that God said you must not eat from every tree of the garden?” "For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." God disagrees with this: Jeremiah 10:23, 24 NWT 23 I well know, O Jehovah, that man’s way does not belong to him. It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step.+ ------------------------------------------------------- Only when this issue is conclusively settled can God justifiably step in. Once that fact is conclusively demonstrated, then it will be time to intervene. Daniel 2:44 ►NIV "In the time of those kings, the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, nor will it be left to another people. It will crush all those kingdoms and bring them to an end, but it will itself endure forever. Stepping in too soon would leave questions unanswered.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 23, 2020 13:27:56 GMT -5
Directing our steps meaning.... As far as purity and fairness and goodwill? For i think that's what succeeding is - for a Kingdom will endure by generosity and goodwill, but topple under the leeching of greeds That was the original idea. A world paradise under the guidance of God inhabited by his obedient Earthly children. Mankind was not created to be independent of God. It was created to depend on his guidance. Satan challenged that arrangement by telling man that God was selfish and that man had a right to decide right from wrong. He insinuated that man could succeed without God if only God would step aside. God allowed the challenge in order to prove otherwise. That was approx 6000 years ago. Had God intervened it could be argued that he did not allow mankind to reach its full creative potential for fear that mankind would succeed. So God must allow mankind to reach a stage where there are absolutely no doubts concerning this issue raised at Eden.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 24, 2020 9:56:02 GMT -5
Interesting. You do raise a point. But then God DID intervene at BABEL. I am not raising a point. I am simply repeating the point that Satan raised in his challenge at Eden. True. He God has intervened numerous times. But Earth in general has been allowed to continue under Satanic rule. Jesus did not dispute that claim. In fact, the Apostle Paul and John acknowledge that this world is generally under satanic control. Paul refers to him as the god and the prince of this world. Tells us that he has the whole world under his power. So all these interventions left the situation more or less intact because the issue raised at Eden still needed to be resolved before God felt justified in regaining full control. However, you do raise a very good point. God did say at Babel that left to their own devices there would be nothing they could not accomplish. However, that statement has to be considered within the context of the rest of the scriptures which describe God's will as irresistible. His present will is that mankind age sicken and die here on earth, and since that is God's will, there is NOTHING mankind can do via technology in order to nullify that judicial decision. Being in one geographical location under one language would never nullify that decision. So it definitely wasn't fear of mankind succeeding against him that caused him to intervene. In view of the above, God's statement can only be understood as either verbal irony or hyperbole.
|
|
|
Post by Radrook Admin on May 25, 2020 19:38:37 GMT -5
One thing that has to be always kept in mind and which the Bible constantly reminds us of is that earth's governments are ALL scheduled to be forcefully removed and replaced by the Kingdom of God.
They are not prophesied to be the means by which mankind finds peace. If indeed they did succeed, then Satan would have been proven true and God a liar, and Satan's rebellion and all other rebellions will have been proven justified. But that is not what we are told will happen:
Christians are supposed to pray for that to happen and waiting hopefully for it to happen and not placing their faith on Earth's kingdoms as the solution to mankind's problems.
Not everyone will be allowed to live on that new Earth. Only those who are willing to live as God wants us to live.
|
|