Post by Radrook Admin on Nov 23, 2019 17:25:24 GMT -5
Reusable type Rockets Stumped NASA for Decades? Really?
So now we are expected to believe that after all that tax money, and all those years of throwing away extremely expensive things after using them once, that along comes a fellow with money and shows NASA how easy it really was to make reusable rockets? Really? Gee!
Does that sound convincing? Were all those highly-educated and trained NASA scientists totally stumped about how to make rockets reusable all those years?
Sorry but I personally I find that extremely hard to believe and it seems like an insult to the intelligence of USA taxpayers. Ummm, much more likely is the possibility that making those rockets non-reusable brought in more tax money for their replacement-monies that could partially be diverted for NASA personnel personal uses. Now THAT sounds far more convincing than to tell us that these NASA eggheads were totally stumped for decades on how to make rockets reusable.
Sorry but I personally I find that extremely hard to believe and it seems like an insult to the intelligence of USA taxpayers. Ummm, much more likely is the possibility that making those rockets non-reusable brought in more tax money for their replacement-monies that could partially be diverted for NASA personnel personal uses. Now THAT sounds far more convincing than to tell us that these NASA eggheads were totally stumped for decades on how to make rockets reusable.